An advert by Julia Roberts endorsing Kamala Harris has sparked blimpish backlash online, pinch immoderate accusing it of undermining marital unity and sparking mistrust.
The ad, produced by Vote Common Good, a non-profit statement aimed astatine mobilizing belief voters, suggests that wives of Trump supporters could softly ballot for Harris.
'In nan 1 spot successful America wherever women still person a correct to choose, you tin ballot immoderate measurement you want, and nary 1 will ever know,' Roberts says, arsenic a female hesitates earlier casting her ballot for Vice President Kamala Harris.
'Did you make nan correct choice?' her hubby later asks. She responds, 'Sure did, honey,' insinuating that she voted for Harris.
Roberts concludes, 'Remember, what happens successful nan booth, stays successful nan booth. Vote Harris-Walz.'
An advertisement by Julia Roberts endorsing Kamala Harris has sparked blimpish backlash online, pinch immoderate accusing it of undermining marital unity and sparking mistrust
The ad, produced by Vote Common Good, a non-profit statement aimed astatine mobilizing belief voters, suggests that wives of Trump supporters could softly ballot for Harris
Critics of nan advertisement accused nan statement of encouraging deceitfulness betwixt joined couples.
A personification connected X said successful a post: 'I can't ideate not knowing precisely really my woman would vote. I can’t ideate my woman not talking to maine astir immoderate of these arguable topics. I can’t judge there’s a run that encourages women to dishonesty and deceive their husbands.
'Right. Encourage marital strife. That's nan measurement to scope joined women. This is truthful disturbing' different X personification said.
Disapproval besides came from female users, who called nan advertisement 'misogynistic.'
'I'm guessing nan group who created this advertisement person ne'er been married, said 1 X user.
'I'm astatine a nonaccomplishment for words astatine really condescending this is towards women,' wrote another user. 'Do Democrats deliberation marriages are stuck successful nan 1950s?'
'If you person to dishonesty to your spouse astir voting, that's nan slightest of your problems…' said another user.
But different users said nan advertisement was an important connection to women who are successful this business pinch their spouses.
'Remember: these ads are not for us. There are millions of highly regressive and patriarchal couples successful this huge, divers country,' 1 personification said, defending nan ad's intentions.
'Don’t dress location aren’t marriages for illustration this. They’re much communal than you think,' said another.
Critics of nan advertisement accused nan statement of encouraging deceitfulness betwixt joined couples
Disapproval besides came from female users, who called nan advertisement 'misogynistic.'
'Can confirm. My parents were this couple. They are not arsenic uncommon arsenic they should be,' said a user.
With 5 days until predetermination day, Donald Trump and Kamala Harris are backmost campaigning successful nan plaything states pinch nan title still adjacent to call.
DailyMail.com's last canvass of nan 2024 run has nan Republican nominee 3 points up of Harris nationwide.